<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eye-Fi Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reactuate.com/2008/04/08/eye-fi-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reactuate.com/2008/04/08/eye-fi-review/</link>
	<description>Re-: to do again. -actuate: 1. To put into motion or action; . 2. To move to action</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 21:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.reactuate.com/2008/04/08/eye-fi-review/#comment-100666</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 00:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reactuate.com/?p=10038#comment-100666</guid>
		<description>I'll give that a try at my next shoot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll give that a try at my next shoot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lgonzales</title>
		<link>http://www.reactuate.com/2008/04/08/eye-fi-review/#comment-100665</link>
		<dc:creator>lgonzales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 21:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reactuate.com/?p=10038#comment-100665</guid>
		<description>Ron,

I am not sure why you were experiencing such lethargic transfer rates. This is not typical or acceptable performance. I am aware of many photographers that are using the Eye-Fi Card in the studio to review images and make adjustments. 

The Eye-Fi Card is not limited to uploading to the web. For a studio it would be best to use "local" or "upload to computer only" mode. Thus avoiding any web uploading bandwidth issues. In "local" mode the Eye-Fi Card transfers the images to your computer over your WiFi through your router. 

To set your Eye-Fi Card to upload to your computer only, just log into the Eye-Fi Manger, go to the settings tab and choose "Upload to Web" and choose "Do not share photos online".

Give that a try, I am confident you will see an improvement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron,</p>
<p>I am not sure why you were experiencing such lethargic transfer rates. This is not typical or acceptable performance. I am aware of many photographers that are using the Eye-Fi Card in the studio to review images and make adjustments. </p>
<p>The Eye-Fi Card is not limited to uploading to the web. For a studio it would be best to use &#8220;local&#8221; or &#8220;upload to computer only&#8221; mode. Thus avoiding any web uploading bandwidth issues. In &#8220;local&#8221; mode the Eye-Fi Card transfers the images to your computer over your WiFi through your router. </p>
<p>To set your Eye-Fi Card to upload to your computer only, just log into the Eye-Fi Manger, go to the settings tab and choose &#8220;Upload to Web&#8221; and choose &#8220;Do not share photos online&#8221;.</p>
<p>Give that a try, I am confident you will see an improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.reactuate.com/2008/04/08/eye-fi-review/#comment-100664</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 20:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reactuate.com/?p=10038#comment-100664</guid>
		<description>Jon:

Thanks for the comment and the article. I'm a believer in shooting RAW, but don't do it on my S3 because the RAW files are huge, 25+MB, and the card writer is slow. So I shoot JPEG and don't have the option of a smaller JPEG.

I'll tried to figure out the local upload option. I seems I have that configured, but it still seems to upload and then download to the computer.

Ron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon:</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment and the article. I&#8217;m a believer in shooting RAW, but don&#8217;t do it on my S3 because the RAW files are huge, 25+MB, and the card writer is slow. So I shoot JPEG and don&#8217;t have the option of a smaller JPEG.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll tried to figure out the local upload option. I seems I have that configured, but it still seems to upload and then download to the computer.</p>
<p>Ron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IkonTools</title>
		<link>http://www.reactuate.com/2008/04/08/eye-fi-review/#comment-100663</link>
		<dc:creator>IkonTools</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 20:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reactuate.com/?p=10038#comment-100663</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I more or less agree with these comments (I assume you were shooting large/fine JPEG?), but see http://www.ikontools.com/reviews/eyefi - it can be made to work reasonably well.

You could set the camera to shoot RAW and small/basic JPEG - that way, only the small JPEGs would be transmitted for viewing and you can transfer the RAWs later.  Alternatively, you could use something like a D3 and write just small basic JPEGs to the second slot, which would contain the Eye-Fi.

If you're finding range a problem, I use a pocket router (D-Link DWL-G730AP) and a battery pack, both in my pocket, to "bridge" a connection between the Eye-Fi and my main router.  That way, signal strength remains high.  I'll probably write an article on that soon...

Regards,
Jon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I more or less agree with these comments (I assume you were shooting large/fine JPEG?), but see <a href="http://www.ikontools.com/reviews/eyefi">http://www.ikontools.com/reviews/eyefi</a> - it can be made to work reasonably well.</p>
<p>You could set the camera to shoot RAW and small/basic JPEG - that way, only the small JPEGs would be transmitted for viewing and you can transfer the RAWs later.  Alternatively, you could use something like a D3 and write just small basic JPEGs to the second slot, which would contain the Eye-Fi.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re finding range a problem, I use a pocket router (D-Link DWL-G730AP) and a battery pack, both in my pocket, to &#8220;bridge&#8221; a connection between the Eye-Fi and my main router.  That way, signal strength remains high.  I&#8217;ll probably write an article on that soon&#8230;</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
